Karma of the Crowd

The February 2014 issue of National Geographic has an interesting article on the “Karma of the Crowd.” Laura Spinney reports on research by psychologist Stephen Reicher of the University of St. Andrews. He looked at the psychological and social effects on Indian Hindus who went on a pilgrimage to Allahabad for the Maha Kumbh Mela festival. Depending on the year, 30 to 70 million Hindus come to bathe and pray at the convergence of the Ganges and Yamuna rivers. The thought of those crowds in a space the size of half of Manhattan (with third-world toilet facilities) makes me want to run the other way. But many pilgrims actually came home healthier and happier than when they left for the Kumbh, despite bathing in heavily polluted water and enduring stress and misery on their travels.

What was going on? Reicher pre-tested and post-tested pilgrims and non-pilgrims on their mental and physical health. The pilgrims showed a 10 percent improvement in such things as pain, breathlessness, anxiety and energy levels. Before you poo-pooh this improvement, realize that many drug companies would be thrilled with this level of success for their pharmaceuticals.

What brings these benefits? Likely the effect of shared identity. “Belonging to a crowd… might thus benefit the individual in the same ways more personal social connections do,” the article says.

Rather than crowds being harmful (think mobs and looting), crowds are critical to society, Reicher is quoted as saying. “They help form our sense of who we are, they help form our relations to others, they even help determine our physical well-being.”

The trick, though, is it can’t be just any crowded subway car. The pilgrims felt tied together in the same purpose and felt a sense of belonging.

In “Pack Leader Psychology,” I proposed a similar concept — that we social humans absolutely need a sense of acceptance and belonging to feel emotional fulfilled. I proposed that modern Western society has so many social and emotional problems because of a lack of sense of belonging to a larger group and cause — a “pack.” This article confirms that theory, even linking the life expectancy in the United States to our lack of social connections and increased isolation.

So it may be time to reconsider. Maybe that sports game is more than just about cheering the home team. And sitting in church is not just about seeking salvation. We all need “a tribe” for a sense of belonging, and with that comes wonderful benefits to our health and wellbeing.

Fear is not a Mental Disorder: Or What is Really Wrong with the DSM

As the American Psychiatric Association (APA) prepares to publish the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) in May 2013, there has been considerable debate about the changes in this document. Client advocacy groups and professional interest groups have stated many objections to DSM-5, with most complaints focusing on specific changes in diagnostic criteria, on placement of diagnostic categories, or on inclusion of diagnostic categories or criteria. Specific complaints about the diagnostic categories include:

  • Asperger’s syndrome should not be on the autism spectrum
  • the addition of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) may pathologize normal childhood temper tantrums
  • the definition of major depressive disorder should not be broadened to include normal bereavement

In addition, more broad-based, theoretical concerns have been expressed by such groups as the American Psychological Association’s Division 32: Society of Humanistic Psychology. In a thorough and thought-provoking letter to the APA in 2011, the group stated that, “it is time for psychiatry and psychology collaboratively to explore the possibility of developing an alternative approach to the conceptualization of emotional distress.”

The controversies surrounding DSM-5 have once again brought up a debate in the profession that the entire atheoretical construct of the DSM should be reconsidered from the ground up. Given the well-documented shortcomings of the DSM, I wholeheartedly concur and have written an essay titled Fear is Not a Mental Disorder The profession needs to move beyond arguing about minor reshuffling of diagnostic categories. These complaints may certainly be justified, but actually are just a rearrangement of the deckchairs on a poorly designed, poorly constructed, and doomed Titanic. The psychology profession must lead an effort to develop a new, improved, and fact-based diagnostic system that is more accurate, clinically useable, beneficial to clients, and provides an effective therapeutic framework.

I am a practicing clinical psychologist who for years has believed that the DSM is inaccurate and misleading in fundamental ways and could even be considered harmful to clients. The mythology of the DSM has for decades hindered therapeutic treatment of clients, and generally complicated what are very simple, understandable concepts that underlie human behavior.

I am not going join the argument of whether Asperger’s is or is not on the autism spectrum, or whether children who throw temper tantrums should be diagnosed with DMDD. Rather, this essay will take a broad, philosophical look at concerns about the DSM. I believe, as many do, that the time is right to completely re-conceptualize diagnostic strategies from the ground up, with the goal of developing a replacement for the DSM.

In Fear is Not a Mental Disorder, I present a powerful and concise theoretical framework to use when diagnosing human behavioral and emotional distresses. This new paradigm called Natural Psychology is explained in depth in my book Pack Leader Psychology. This paradigm offers numerous benefits not found in the DSM, corrects many of the theoretical errors in the DSM, and provides an effective diagnostic and therapeutic solution. And it does so in far less than the 943 pages of the DSM-IV-TR.

Natural Psychology is based on indisputable facts, not the unscientific, confusing, and complex “system” of “diagnostics” of the DSM. Most important, the Natural Psychology model brings numerous benefits to clients, whom we in the psychology profession are ethically bound to protect and help. Where the DSM pathologizes human behaviors as illnesses and disorders, Natural Psychology offers an innovative paradigm that explains these behaviors as normal, natural responses to perceived or real threats and fears. Natural Psychology is a more positive, optimistic, and straightforward framework that strips away harmful, judgmental labels and de-stigmatizes “mental illness” in a profound and fundamental way.

Quite simply, Natural Psychology is based on this concept:

The majority of “mental disorders” that people experience are due to the primal fear response. Fear is not a disorder, but a normal, adaptive human reaction.

I realize that criticizing the “bible” of the psychiatric profession may be sacrilegious to many, but I believe the psychology profession has a duty to serve clients. Keep an open mind as you read this essay. Remember that just because the DSM has an aura of scientific precision, does not prove that its ideas are valid. The DSM is published by a major medical organization and is loaded with technical language, complex numbering systems, obscure terminology, and weighs an intimidating three pounds, but that does not make its precedence unchallengeable.

The publication of the DSM-5 may the tipping point in a history of over-reaching and misinformation by the American Psychiatric Association, forcing the psychology profession to take action.

In Fear is Not a Mental Disorder I will discuss:

1. What is the DSM?

2. How the DSM ignores major psychological facts and concepts

3. A new diagnostic paradigm called Natural Psychology

4. 10 reasons why Natural Psychology should replace the DSM

I recognize these ideas are controversial, but please keep an open mind, click on the link to open the PDF and read the entire essay.   Then join me in a discussion about the DSM-5 and mental health diagnostics in general. I would LOVE to hear your comments.

PDF of Essay:  Fear is Not a Mental Disorder

The Dog That Taught Me About Leadership

Image

Reilly, the Muse for “Pack Leader Psychology”

As I say in “Pack Leader Psychology,” a growl instantly moved me from pack member to pack leader with my dog, Reilly. But if I hadn’t had a dog that understood how to be a pack member, I might never have learned this lesson. And I might never have made the connection that being a pack leader to people might also be a good thing for my interpersonal relationships as well.

The story begins when I got Reilly as an eight-month-old dog. She had grown up in an outdoor kennel with her birth pack and several adult dogs. Living for so long with this normal dog pack taught Reilly how to recognize and honor the pack leader or leaders — probably her mother and father.

Continue reading

Welcome to the inaugural Pack Leader Psychology blog post!

I’m very excited to begin this new adventure that has been about six years in the making. I have written a non-fiction self-help book called “Pack Leader Psychology,” and this blog is the first step in introducing the ideas in that book to the public. A full website will follow soon and the book is now available as an e-book on Amazon (Kindle fans!). Print and e-versions on B&N and other sites will be due shortly.

So what is the book about?  Tough to shorten 230 pages down into a few paragraphs, but here goes:

“Pack Leader Psychology” recounts the lessons I learned while becoming a pack leader to my dog, Reilly, that helped transform me from a submissive, abused wife into a calm, confident, independent and assertive human pack leader. Read More